Logo Martin Le Poidevin

Martin laughing
Autotune - a valid tool or just cheating
martinlp • 23 August 2010 • Number of comments: 0

I just read the BBC News feature about Autotune. There are, apparently, insinuations that X-Factor is using it to help its contestants this year.

I'd heard of Autotune, but had never really investigated its effects, potential or how widespread was its use. It appears that it's actually very widespread in the profession.

Obviously, I dislike it. As the feature says, once upon a time recording artists were "more committed to becoming better singers". Autotune is just going to make it easier to be lazy, and it's going to make any live performances these guys do a lot more disappointing - even unbearable.

But there'll be another effect. The examples (whoops - alleged examples) in the feature show some of the side effects of the tuning process. They're subtle, but there are now going to be young would-be singers who want to imitate those sounds without the benefit of Autotune. And, being young, being determined and not knowing any better, they'll probably manage it. Our job, as teachers, will be to incorporate those new sounds and make them vocally safe and repeatable.

And, of course, to work on getting the tuning right without Autotune.


The aviation industry waits...
martinlp • 19 April 2010 • Number of comments: 0

Having been a part of the aviation industry - albeit a small part - until last summer, I've been watching the volcanic ash events with interest.

I remember some time ago, studying for either my Meteorology or Aviation Law exam (can't remember which) reading about Ashtams (don't think they're actually called that) and thinking they'd never affect us. Well, turns out that they can.

I know of the incidents which have lead to this paranoia about flying through volcanic ash, and I can see that they cause concern. There are real potential problems. I can also see why they never did anything about planning for it in Europe. I mean, can you imagine the public reaction (or the shareholders' reaction!) if we/they found that some of our ticket money was being diverted into volcanic ash contingencies. What volcanoes? In Europe!?

However, the situation is now getting quite tense. Airlines are losing money, and the rumour from the inside is that they can't sustain that for long. And there's the rest of the economy. I've just been to a school where at least three teachers are stranded abroad. Heard this morning of a school with 15 in the same boat (out of 70). And what about imports? Food? Supplies? Many people beyond the obvious ones are suffering.  

My prediction? Some airlines have flown tests through the dust and had no problem. On the other hand, the Met Office (I think) apparently has done the same, and identified potential dangers. Sure, one set of flights were looking for the problem, the others weren't - so you're bound to get conflicting answers. However, I think public pressure will prevail and later this week, whatever the volcanic outlook, we'll be flying again. Then there'll be incidents - maybe just one, with just one engine on one aircraft showing a problem. Nobody will die; but the cat will truly be amongst the pigeons.

interesting. And for once, for now, at last - I'm an observer.


The aviation industry waits...
martinlp • 19 April 2010 • Number of comments: 0

Having been a part of the aviation industry - albeit a small part - until last summer, I've been watching the volcanic ash events with interest.

I remember some time ago, studying for either my Meteorology or Aviation Law exam (can't remember which) reading about Ashtams (don't think they're actually called that) and thinking they'd never affect us. Well, turns out that they can.

I know of the incidents which have lead to this paranoia about flying through volcanic ash, and I can see that they cause concern. There are real potential problems. I can also see why they never did anything about planning for it in Europe. I mean, can you imagine the public reaction (or the shareholders' reaction!) if we/they found that some of our ticket money was being diverted into volcanic ash contingencies. What volcanoes? In Europe!?

However, the situation is now getting quite tense. Airlines are losing money, and the rumour from the inside is that they can't sustain that for long. And there's the rest of the economy. I've just been to a school where at least three teachers are stranded abroad. Heard this morning of a school with 15 in the same boat (out of 70). And what about imports? Food? Supplies? Many people beyond the obvious ones are suffering.  

My prediction? Some airlines have flown tests through the dust and had no problem. On the other hand, the Met Office (I think) apparently has done the same, and identified potential dangers. Sure, one set of flights were looking for the problem, the others weren't - so you're bound to get conflicting answers. However, I think public pressure will prevail and later this week, whatever the volcanic outlook, we'll be flying again. Then there'll be incidents - maybe just one, with just one engine on one aircraft showing a problem. Nobody will die; but the cat will truly be amongst the pigeons.

interesting. And for once, for now, at last - I'm an observer.